Tuesday, September 6, 2011, 10:00 A.M.,
Earl Warren Building
350 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA

 

S189476 - PERRY v. BROWN   

1. Ordering Certifying a Question to the Supreme Court of California
2. 1. Opinion
   2. Concurrence to the Certification Order and Per Curiam Opinion
   3. Memorandum Regarding Motion to Disqualify
   4. Memorandum Re: Additional Counsel
3. Letter in Opposition to the Request of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Filed by Counsel Theodore B. Olson on January 24, 2011
4. Letter Requesting this Court to Grant the Request of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Filed by Counsel Damien M. Schiff on January 24, 2011
5. Letter in Support to the Request of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Filed by Counsel Charles J. Cooper on January 24, 2011
6. Letter Requesting this Court to Reformulate the Questions Certified to it by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Filed by Counsel Therese M. Stewart on January 24, 2011
7. Letter Filed by Counsel Theodore B. Olson on February 2, 2011, in Reply to the Letter Submitted by Counsel Charles J. Cooper on January 24, 2011
8. Letter Filed by Counsel Charles J. Cooper on February 7, 2011, in Response to the Letter Submitted by Counsel Therese M. Stewart on January 24, 2011
9. Letter Requesting the Court to Speed Adjudication of this Case, Filed by Counsel Therese M. Stewart on February 24, 2011
10. Appellants, Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight, Martin F. Gutierrez, Mark A. Jansson, and ProtectMarriage.com, Opening Brief on the Merits
11. Appellants, Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight, Martin F. Gutierrez, Mark A. Jansson, and ProtectMarriage.com, Appendix to Opening Brief on the Merits
12. Respondents, Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Answer Brief on the Merits
13. Respondent, City and County of San Francisco, Answer Brief on the Merits
14. Respondent, City and County of San Francisco, Appendix to Answer Brief on the Merits
15. Respondent, City and County of San Francisco, Request for Judicial Notice
16. Letter Filed by Deputy City Attorney Christine Van Aken on April 18, 2011, Advising the Court of an En Banc Opinion Issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on April 12, 2011
17. Appellants, Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight, Martin F. Gutierrez, Mark A. Jansson, and ProtectMarriage.com, Reply Brief on the Merits
18. Amicus Curiae Brief of Attorney General Kamala D. Harris, Filed on May 2, 2011
19. Amicus Curiae Brief of Pacific Legal Foundation, Ward Connerly, et al., Filed on May 6, 2011
20. Amicus Curiae Brief of League of Women Voters of California, Filed on May 6, 2011
21. Amicus Curiae Brief of California Faith for Equality, California Council of Churches, et al., Filed on May 6, 2011
22. Amicus Curiae Brief of County of Santa Clara, County of Santa Cruz, et al., Filed on May 6, 2011
23. Amicus Curiae Brief of Margie Reilly, Filed on May 6, 2011
24. Amicus Curiae Brief of Jon B. Eisenberg and Laurie L. Levenson, Filed on May 6, 2011
25. Amicus Curiae Brief of Equality California, National Center for Lesbian Rights, et al., Filed on May 6, 2011
26. Amicus Curiae Brief of Judicial Watch, Inc., Filed on May 6, 2011
27. Amicus Curiae Brief of Joshua Beckley, Filed on May 6, 2011
28. Amicus Curiae Brief of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, Filed on May 6, 2011
29. Respondent, City and County of San Francisco, Reply to Amicus Briefs, Filed on May 9, 2011
30. Respondents, Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Reply to Amicus Briefs, Filed on May 9, 2011
31. Appellants, Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight, Martin F. Gutierrez, Mark A. Jansson, and ProtectMarriage.com, Reply to Amicus Briefs, Filed on May 10, 2011
    

Tuesday, September 6, 2011, 1:30 P.M.,
Earl Warren Building
350 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA

S042660 - PEOPLE v. DEMENT (RONNIE D.)

1. Appellant's Opening Brief
2. Respondent's Brief
3. Appellant's Reply Brief

S066939 - PEOPLE v. ALLEN & JOHNSON

1. Appellant, Cleamon Johnson, Opening Brief
2. Appellant, Michael Allen, Opening Brief
3. Respondent's Brief
4. Respondent's Letter Brief Filed on April 20, 2006
5. Appellant, Cleamon Johnson, Reply Brief
6. Appellant, Michael Allen, Reply Brief
7. Appellant, Cleamon Johnson, Supplemental Brief
8. Respondent's Letter Brief Filed on August 5, 2011

Wednesday, September 7, 2011, 9:30 A.M.,
University of California, Hastings College of Law
198 McAllister Street, 4th Floor, San Francisco, CA

 

S184212 - PEOPLE v. VANG

1. Case Summary
2. Appellant, Danny Quang Le, Petition for Review
3. Appellant, Xue Vang, Petition for Review
4. Appellant, Dang Hai Ha, Petition for Review
5. Appellant, Sunny Sitthideth, Petition for Review
6. Appellant, Xue Vang, Opening Brief on the Merits
7. Respondent's Answer Brief on the Merits
8. Appellant, Xue Vang, Reply Brief on the Merits

 

S188128 - LOS ANGELES COUNTY M.T.A. v. ALAMEDA PRODUCE MARKET
(Marchiano, P.J., assigned justice pro tempore)

1. Case Summary
2. Respondent, Alameda Produce Market LLC, Petition for Review
3. Appellant's Answer to Petition for Review
4. Respondent, Alameda Produce Market LLC, Reply to Answer to Petition for Review
5. Respondent, Alameda Produce Market LLC, Opening Brief on the Merits
6. Appellant's Answer Brief on the Merits
7. Respondent, Alameda Produce Market LLC, Reply Brief on the Merits
   

Wednesday, September 7, 2011, 1:30 P.M.,
University of California, Hastings College of Law
198 McAllister Street, 4th Floor, San Francisco, CA

 

S183372 - SERRANO v. STEFAN MERLI PLASTERING

1. Case Summary
2. Appellants' Petition for Review
3. Respondent's Answer to Petition for Review
4. Appellants' Reply to Answer to Petition for Review
5. Appellants' Opening Brief on the Merits
6. Respondent's Answer Brief on the Merits
7. Respondent's Request for Judicial Notice
8. Appellants' Reply Brief on the Merits
9. Appellants' Request for Judicial Notice

S065467 - PEOPLE v. MENDOZA (RONALD)

1. Case Summary
2. Appellant's Opening Brief
3. Respondent's Brief
4. Appellant's Reply Brief
5. Respondent's Letter Brief
6. Appellant's Letter Brief
7. Respondent's Reply Letter Brief