Rule 4.405. Definitions
As used in this division, unless the context otherwise requires:
(1)"These rules" means the rules in this division.
(2)"Base term" is the determinate prison term selected from among the three possible terms prescribed by statute or the determinate prison term prescribed by law if a range of three possible terms is not prescribed.
(3)"Enhancement" means an additional term of imprisonment added to the base term.
(4)"Aggravation" or "circumstances in aggravation" means factors that the court may consider in its broad discretion in imposing one of the three authorized prison terms referred to in section 1170(b).
(5)"Mitigation" or "circumstances in mitigation" means factors that the court may consider in its broad discretion in imposing one of the three authorized prison terms referred to in section 1170(b) or factors that may justify the court in striking the additional punishment for an enhancement when the court has discretion to do so.
(6)"Sentence choice" means the selection of any disposition of the case that does not amount to a dismissal, acquittal, or grant of a new trial.
(7)"Section" means a section of the Penal Code.
(8)"Imprisonment" means confinement in a state prison.
(9)"Charged" means charged in the indictment or information.
(10)"Found" means admitted by the defendant or found to be true by the trier of fact upon trial.
Rule 4.405 amended effective May 23, 2007; adopted as rule 405 effective July 1, 1977; previously renumbered effective January 1, 2001; previously amended effective July 28, 1977, January 1, 1991, July 1, 2003, and January 1, 2007.
Advisory Committee Comment
"Base term" is the term of imprisonment selected under section 1170(b) from the three possible terms. (See section 1170(a)(3); People v. Scott (1994) 9 Cal.4th 331, 349.) Following the United States Supreme Court decision in Cunningham v. California (2007) 549 U.S.__ [127 S.Ct. 856.], the Legislature amended the determinate sentencing law. (See Sen. Bill 40; Stats. 2007, ch. 3.) To comply with those changes, these rules were also amended. In light of those amendments, for clarity, the phrase "base term" in (4) and (5) was replaced with "one of the three authorized prison terms." It is an open question whether the definitions in (4) and (5) apply to enhancements for which the statute provides for three possible terms. The Legislature in SB 40 amended section 1170(b) but did not modify sections 1170.1(d), 12022.2(a), 12022.3(b), or any other section providing for an enhancement with three possible terms. The latter sections provide that "the court shall impose the middle term unless there are circumstances in aggravation or mitigation." (See, e.g., section 1170.1(d).) It is possible, although there are no cases addressing the point, that this enhancement triad with the presumptive imposition of the middle term runs afoul of Cunningham. Because of this open question, rule 4.428(b) was deleted.
"Enhancement." The facts giving rise to an enhancement, the requirements for pleading and proving those facts, and the court's authority to strike the additional term are prescribed by statutes. See, for example, sections 667.5 (prior prison terms), 12022 (being armed with a firearm or using a deadly weapon), 12022.5 (using a firearm), 12022.6 (excessive taking or damage), 12022.7 (great bodily injury), 1170.1(e) (pleading and proof), and 1385(c) (authority to strike the additional punishment). Note: A consecutive sentence is not an enhancement. (See section 1170.1(a); People v. Tassell (1984) 36 Cal.3d 77, 90 [overruled on other grounds in People v. Ewoldt (1994) 7 Cal.4th 380, 401].)
"Sentence choice." Section 1170(c) requires the judge to state reasons for the sentence choice. This general requirement is discussed in rule 4.406.
"Imprisonment" is distinguished from confinement in other types of facilities.
"Charged" and "found." Statutes require that the facts giving rise to all enhancements be charged and found. See section 1170.1(e).