Rule 10.21. Proposals from members of the public for changes to rules, standards, or forms
This rule applies to proposals for changes to rules, standards, or forms by a member of the public (any person or organization other than a Judicial Council internal committee, advisory committee, or task force, or the Administrative Office of the Courts).
(b) Submission and content of proposals
Proposals must be submitted in writing to: Judicial Council of California, Attention: General Counsel. Proposals should include:
(1)The text of the proposed rule, standard, form, or amendment;
(2)A description of the problem to be addressed;
(3)The proposed solution and alternative solutions;
(4)Any likely implementation problems;
(5)Any need for urgent consideration;
(6)Known proponents and opponents;
(7)Any known fiscal impact; and
(8)If known, any previous action by the council or an advisory committee on the proposal.
(c) Advisory committee's review of proposal
The General Counsel must refer each proposal from a member of the public to an appropriate advisory committee for consideration and recommendation, or, if no appropriate advisory committee exists, to the Rules and Projects Committee. An Administrative Office of the Courts staff member may independently review the proposal and present an analysis and a recommendation to the committee. The committee may take one of the following actions:
(1)Accept the proposal, either as submitted or modified, and proceed under rule 10.22;
(2)Request further information or analysis; or
(3)Reject the proposal.
(Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2007.)
Rule 10.21 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as rule 6.21 effective January 1, 2002.