Kern County, New Delano Courthouse

 North Kern Regional Court, Delano

Superior Court of California, County of Kern

Funded by Senate Bill 1407
Initial Funding Year: FY 2009-2010

The overcrowded North Kern Regional Court in Delano

Current Status
Because of significant, ongoing cuts to the judicial branch budget, this project is indefinitely delayed, based on the Judicial Council's October 26, 2012 decision.

Vital Statistics
Courtrooms: 3
Square footage: 39,780
Current authorized project budget: $41,666,000 
More information

In anticipation of additional cost-cutting measures, all facts are subject to change.
The Superior Court of Kern County operates two facilities in northern Kern County: the Shafter/Wasco Branch in Shafter, and the Delano/McFarland Branch Courthouse, also known as the North Kern Regional Court, in Delano. The Delano facility serves the communities of Delano, Elmo, Famoso, McFarland, Pond, Richgrove, Vineland, and other outlying rural areas. This court also handles cases from two neighboring prisons: Kern Valley State Prison and North Kern State Prison.

The Delano courthouse has experienced a caseload increase of more than 80% in the last ten years. It is overcrowded, physically deficient, and significantly lacking in security features to current standards, including adequate holding facilities for in-custody defendants.

The proposed project would replace the Delano courthouse with a modern, secure facility for criminal, traffic, civil, family, probate, and juvenile cases. It would enable the court to provide basic services it cannot currently offer due to space restrictions: jury assembly space, a self-help center, a children's waiting room, family court mediation, attorney interview/witness waiting rooms, and secure circulation for court staff and court visitors, as well as secure in-custody holding. It would also provide an additional courtroom to accommodate one planned new judgeship.

On October 26, 2012, the Judicial Council voted to delay this project indefinitely, due to unprecedented cuts to the judicial branch budget.


Architecture/Engineering Firm

LPA Inc.

Construction Manager at Risk

To be selected, schedule TBD

Construction subcontractors

Schedule TBD

What is the impact of the state’s current budget crisis on this project?

Since 2009, $1.5 billion in court construction funds have been borrowed, swept to the General Fund, or redirected to court operations As a result, this project, as with other courthouse projects statewide, has been subjected to several delays, and has been required by the Judicial Council to undergo reductions to its construction budget, overseen by a statewide oversight committee of justices, judges, and public building experts. Funding of future phases of this project depends in part on what happens to court construction funds in future fiscal years.

November 2011

Who is the Judicial Council, and why are they managing this project?

The Judicial Council is the policymaking body for the California court system, including the trial courts, known as “Superior Courts,” based in each county. Among other responsibilities, the council—through its Capital Program office—is responsible for planning, acquisition, design, renovation, and construction of court facilities. The new courthouse will be owned by the judicial branch.

Why does the Judicial Council decide where the new court is built? Why isn't this a county decision?

Historically, trial courts functioned largely as county departments, but that changed in 2002, with passage of the Trial Court Facilities Act. This law made the State of California responsible for court facilities statewide, rather than the counties. The law gave the Judicial Council responsibility for facilities owned or occupied by the courts and made it responsible for operations, maintenance, and repairs, as well as site acquisition, planning, design, and construction of capital projects that replace or renovate courthouses. Council staff work closely with each affected Superior Court and justice agency stakeholders throughout the process of replacing or renovating courthouses. By Rules of Court, staff involve the public primarily through the Project Advisory Group, although depending on the needs of the project, public input may be sought at various stages.

Why is a new courthouse needed?

The current courthouse in Delano has significant deficiencies that adversely affect access to justice. The facility has severe security problems and is overcrowded. The Judicial Council's functional study of the courthouse indicates that the court needs more than five times the square footage it currently occupies in order to meet design standards for proper security, public access, and operational efficiency.
For example, on peak days, approximately 400 people enter the building, and that number will increase as northern Kern County continues to grow. In addition, the new courthouse’s caseload will increase with the handling of cases from Kern Valley State Prison and North Kern State Prison. The public enters and exits the building through one set of double doors, making ingress and egress very congested. The building lacks a jury assembly room, so current juror check-in and assembly take place in courtroom waiting areas. The building lacks secure hallways and holding cells adjacent to courtrooms, so in-custody defendants use the same hallways as the public and staff. There is also no secured sallyport for safe transfer of in-custody defendants. The courthouse does not comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the site has very limited parking for public and staff and no secured parking for judicial officers.

How is the new courthouse being funded?

The courthouse will be funded from statewide increases in court user fees, authorized by Senate Bill 1407, which passed in 2008. This bill approved the issuance of up to $5 billion in lease-revenue bonds to fund this and 40 other projects throughout the state. The bonds will be repaid with court fees, penalties, and assessments.

Who decides where the new courthouse will be located?

In deciding where to locate the new courthouse, the Judicial Council staff is working closely with the Superior Court and a Project Advisory Group, which includes members of the Superior Court, and representatives from the local community, the Sheriff’s Office, and the County of Kern. The Judicial Council staff and the Project Advisory Group followed the Judicial Council’s standard site selection policy and process. The process involves objectively defining criteria for potential courthouse sites, evaluating all potential available sites, and selecting at least two sites that meet agreed-upon criteria for the proposed new courthouse for the Delano area and that fit within the limits of the project’s budget and schedule. With the assistance of a local real estate broker, the Judicial Council identified possible sites, and the Project Advisory Group ranked the sites according to the selection criteria.

How much land is required for the project?

Approximately 3.5 acres are required for the courthouse and associated surface parking.
What potential sites have been considered?

The Judicial Council and the PAG considered more than six sites, but ultimately focused on two potential sites― one in downtown Delano and the other near the Delano Municipal Airport. The downtown site is approximately 3.5 acres of the Delano Redevelopment Agency’s property at the southeast corner of 11th Avenue and Fremont Street. The second site is approximately 3.5 acres of an 11-acre parcel at the northwest corner of Wolloomes Avenue and Lexington Avenue. The State Public Works Board (SPWB) approved these sites on April 8, 2011. Although the Judicial Council and PAG seriously considered the downtown site, the Lexington Avenue site is now considered the best site for the project. Pending completion of environmental review, the Judicial Council will request approval of acquisition of the Lexington/Woollomes site by SPWB in spring 2012.

Who is the lead agency for CEQA? How and when are environmental reviews being conducted?

The Judicial Council is the lead agency for environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Judicial Council has developed and issued a draft mitigated negative declaration for the project, available under the "Background"  on this web page. The CEQA public comment period began on November 29 and ends on December 28, 2011.

Why is money being spent on a new courthouse when there are so many other local needs and there is a state budget crisis?

The project is solely funded and managed by the State of California. Funds have been specifically approved by the state Legislature for courthouse construction. These funds come from increased court fees and fines; therefore, construction of new courthouses is paid by “user fees” and not money from the state's General Fund.

How will the local community have input regarding the courthouse project?

Key community leaders have been involved as members of the Project Advisory Group; members are listed in this news release. The Judicial Council will conduct public information meetings at several stages in the project.

How many courtrooms will be in the new courthouse?  Will the new courthouse provide space for any county departments?

The proposed courthouse is approximately 39,780 square feet and includes three courtrooms.  The Judicial Council is not authorized to use any SB 1407 funds for construction of County facilities.

Will new county offices be located close to the new courthouse?

The Judicial Council and the Court have been approached about potentially utilizing space within the building to house justice partners. The Judicial Council is not authorized to use any SB 1407 funds for construction of county facilities, so the construction and operation of a new county building would be the County’s responsibility. However, the new courthouse will provide “hoteling” space for justice partners to use during their courthouse visits.

Who will design the building?

The Judicial Council conducted a search for an architecture and engineering firm for this project. The request for qualifications went out January 29, 2010, and the Judicial Council reviewed numerous proposals from highly qualified firms. The Judicial Council and the Court participated in interviews of a short list of candidate firms. On July 1, 2010, the Judicial Council announced the final selection of LPA Architects. LPA is a California-based, integrated design firm founded in 1965. The firm has extensive experience with sustainable design and has completed numerous civic architecture projects statewide. LPA intends to serve the Kern County project from their Southern California office in Irvine.

Will the project hire local contractors and use local suppliers?  Will this project help our community?

When the project is in architectural design, the Judicial Council will select a construction manager, currently scheduled for summer 2012. The construction manager will perform local outreach to ensure that qualified local subcontractors and suppliers have the opportunity to bid on construction work when that phase nears. These projects provide valuable economic stimulus in local communities—the Delano courthouse project is estimated to create between 800 and 1,000 direct and indirect jobs.

Will the new courthouse be energy-efficient and sustainably designed?

Yes. All courthouse projects to be funded by SB 1407 are being designed to achieve LEED Silver rating by the U.S. Green Building Council. This is a national standard for sustainable design, and energy efficiency is among its key criteria.

Contact Info

Judicial Council of California
Capital Program

455 Golden Gate Avenue, 8th Floor
San Francisco, California

Customer Service Center:
888-225-3583 or
© 2018 Judicial Council of California