Staff of the AOC, CFCC have provided training on Assembly Bill 129 and dual-jurisdiction issues in California and nationwide, and continue to provide technical assistance to local courts for issues related to AB 129 dual-jurisdiction protocols.
The chart below provides protocols for counties who have implemented them.
| County | Effective Date |
| Butte | March 22, 2011 |
| Colusa |
March 23, 2006 |
| Del Norte | March 18, 2010 - June 30, 2011 |
| Los Angeles | October 11, 2011 |
| Inyo | December 13, 2005 |
| Modoc | April 4, 2008 |
| Placer | December 14, 2005 |
| Riverside | October 5, 2005 |
| San Bernardino | November 30, 2011 |
| San Joaquin | December 19, 2005 |
| San Mateo | April 13, 2007 |
| Santa Clara | February 11, 2010 |
| Siskiyou | February 13, 2008 |
| Sonoma | September 7, 2006 |
|
December 23, 2005 |
See a Summary of Protocols by County. (February 2013)
Contact Laura Pedicini for more information.
Assembly Bill 129 Legislation
All County Information Notice No. I-05-06: Dual Status Children (California Department of Social Services)
Dual-Status Children: Protocols for Implementing Assembly Bill 129 – A Report to the California Legislature (2004)
Assembly Bill 129 allowed counties to develop a local protocol to designate certain children as having dual status, i.e., being both a dependent child and a ward of the juvenile court. AB 129 required the Judicial Council to evaluate the implementation of these protocols and to report its findings to the Legislature within two years of the date that participating counties first deem a child to be a dual-status child. The report addresses the following questions:
Research Update: Dual-Status Children: Protocols for Implementing Assembly Bill 129 (October 2008)
Welfare & Institutions Code §241.1