Information Technology Advisory Committee

Purpose:
The committee makes recommendations to the council for improving the administration of justice through the use of technology and for fostering cooperative endeavors to resolve common technological issues with other stakeholders in the justice system.

Date(s) Established: CTAC 1995-Aug. 2015; ITAC Sept. 2015-present

Key projects of this advisory body are outlined in the annual agenda .

February 5, 2016 Rules and Policy Subcommittee Meeting (Teleconference)
Joint meeting with the Civil and Small Claims Advisory Committee’s Unlimited Case and Complex Litigation Subcommittee
12:10 PM – 1:10 PM
Public Call-In Number: 1-877-820-7831 Public Access Code: # 1437245

February 11, 2016  Joint Appellate Technology Subcommittee Meeting (Teleconference)
3:00 PM - 4:30 PM  Open Meeting
Public Call In Number :  1-877-820-7831 Public Access Code # 1437245

February 16, 2016 Rules and Policy Subcommittee Meeting (Teleconference)
12:10 PM – 1:10 PM Open Meeting
Public Call-In Number: 1-877-820-7831 Public Access Code # 1437245



Previous Information Technology Advisory Committee Meetings

Previous Court Technology Advisory Committee Meetings

The 22 member advisory committee is comprised of appellate and superior court judicial officers and court administrators, a member of both the Senate and Assembly, a member of the State Bar, and a public member (currently, law school faculty), along with advisory staff from the Judicial Council and reports directly to the Judicial Council Technology Committee. Members are appointed by the Chief Justice for a three-year term.

Download the committee roster.

  • Hon. Terence L. Bruiniers, Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Five, ITAC Chair
  • Hon. Robert B. Freedman, Judge of the Superior Court of CA, County of Alameda, ITAC Vice-Chair
  • Hon. Kyle S. Brodie, Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino
  • Hon. Joan Buchanan, Member, California State Assembly, 15th District
  • Mr. Brian Cotta, Chief Information Officer/ Director of Technology Superior Court of California, County of Fresno
  • Hon. Julie R. Culver, Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Monterey
  • Prof. Dorothy J. Glancy, Santa Clara University School of Law
  • Hon. Michael S. Groch, Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego
  • Hon. Sheila F. Hanson, Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Orange
  • Hon. Samantha P. Jessner, Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
  • Hon. Jackson Lucky, Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Riverside
  • Hon. Louis R. Mauro, Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District
  • Hon. James M. Mize, Judge of the Superior Court of CA, County of Sacramento
  • Mr. Terry McNally, Court Executive Officer of the Superior Court of California, County of Kern
  • Mr. Snorri Ogata, Chief Information Officer, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
  • Mr. Robert Oyung, Chief Technology Officer, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara
  • Mr. Darrel E. Parker, Court Executive Officer of the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Barbara
  • Hon. Alan G. Perkins, Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento
  • Hon. Peter J. Siggins, Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal First Appellate District, Division Three
  • Hon. Mark Stone, Member, California State Assembly
  • Mr. Don Willenburg, Partner, Gordon & Rees LLP
  • Mr. David H. Yamasaki, Court Executive Officer, Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara

ITAC's Rules & Policy Subcommittee

  • Hon. Peter J. Siggins, Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal First Appellate District, Division Three, Chair
  • Prof. Dorothy J. Glancy, Santa Clara University School of Law, Vice-Chair
  • Hon. Kyle S. Brodie, Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino
  • Hon. Julie R. Culver, Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Monterey
  • Hon. Louis R. Mauro, Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District
  • Mr. Don Willenburg, Partner, Gordon & Rees LLP
  • Hon. Theodore C. Zayner, Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara

ITAC's Projects Subcommittee

  • Hon. Robert B. Freedman, Judge of the Superior Court of CA, County of Alameda, Chair
  • Hon. Jeffrey B. Barton, Judge of the Superior Court of CA, County of San Diego
  • Hon. Shelia F. Hanson, Judge of the Superior Court of CA, County of Orange
  • Hon. Samantha P. Jessner, Judge of the Superior Court of CA, County of Los Angeles
  • Hon. James M. Mize, Judge of the Superior Court of CA, County of Sacramento
  • Hon. Alan G. Perkins, Judge of the Superior Court of CA, County of Sacramento
  • Mr. Jake Chatters, Court Executive Officer, Superior Court of CA, County of Placer
  • Mr. Robert Oyung, Chief Technology Officer, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara
  • Mr. Pat Patterson, Technology Officer, Superior Court of CA, County of Ventura
  • Mr. David Yamasaki, Chief Executive Officer, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara

Joint Appellate Technology Subcommittee

  • Hon. Louis R. Mauro, Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, Chair
  • Mr. Kevin Green, Partner, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
  • Mr. Joseph Lane, Clerk/Executive Officer of the Court of Appeal, Second District
  • Mr. Frank A. McGuire, Clerk of the California Supreme Court
  • Hon. Peter J. Siggins, Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Three
  • Ms. Kimberly Stewart, Appellate Court Managing Attorney, Court of Appellate, Fourth Appellate District
  • Mr. Don Willenburg, Partner, Gordon & Rees LLP

Information Systems Controls Framework: "How to Use" Guide and Checklist 
Approved by the Judicial Council Technology Committee and the Information Technology Advisory Committee (ITAC). Prepared by the ITAC Information Security Framework Workstream October 2015. Full report to the Judicial Council, October 8, 2015.

Advancing Access to Justice Through Technology: Guiding Principles for California Judicial Branch Initiatives
Approved by the Judicial Council August 2012. Prepared by the CTAC Outreach Subcommittee.

Background
Initially the Court Technology Task Force was created in 1994 as a transitional body, designed to bridge the analyses of the 2020 Commission regarding court technology and the formation of the Court Technology Standing Advisory Committee. In 1995, the Judicial Council adopted the task force’s recommendations and formed the Court Technology Advisory Committee (CTAC) as a standing committee. CTAC’s Rule of Court was established in 1999. In 2015, a rule of court amendment renamed the committee the Information Technology Advisory Committee (ITAC) and revised its roles and responsibilities to reflect the committee’s sponsorship of statewide technology initiatives.

Charge
Per Rule of Court 10.53, ITAC makes recommendations to the council for improving the administration of justice through the use of technology and for fostering cooperative endeavors to resolve common technological issues with other stakeholders in the justice system. The committee promotes, coordinates, and acts as executive sponsor for projects and initiatives that apply technology to the work of the courts.

In addition to the duties outlined for all advisory committees, ITAC must also:

  1. Oversee branchwide technology initiatives funded in whole or in part by the state;
  2. Recommend rules, standards, and legislation to ensure compatibility in information and communication technologies in the judicial branch;
  3. Provide input to the Judicial Council Technology Committee on the technology and business requirements of court technology projects and initiatives in funding requests;
  4. Review and recommend legislation, rules, or policies to balance the interests of privacy, access, and security in relation to court technology;
  5. Make proposals for technology education and training in the judicial branch;
  6. Assist courts in acquiring and developing useful technologies;
  7. Establish mechanisms to collect, preserve, and share best practices across the state;
  8. Develop and recommend a tactical technology plan, described in rule 10.16, with input from the individual appellate and trial courts; and
  9. Develop and recommend the committee’s annual agenda, identifying individual technology initiatives scheduled for the next year.

Contact Information

Information Technology
Administrative
ITAC@jud.ca.gov

Site Map | Careers | Contact Us | Accessibility | Public Access to Records | Terms of Use | Privacy