In Focus Sub Banner

In Focus: Judicial Branch Budget Crisis

Video: Budget Cut Impacts

Related Links

Local bar associations report on impacts of judicial branch budget reductions on legal practitioners and the public:

Impacts

Statewide Impacts


Mandated public service reports and periodic surveys reflect the severe and growing impact of budget cuts since 2008:

•  Court closures have deprived more than 2 million Californians of access to justice in their local communities.

•  53 courthouses and a total of 204 courtrooms have closed.

•  30 courts have had to reduce hours at public service counters.

•  15 courts have had to institute limited court service days (where the majority of courtrooms and clerk's offices are closed).

•  Nearly 4,000 court staff have lost their jobs. Many courts are leaving vacant positions unfilled, and some courts continue to furlough employees.


Impacts by County

Members of the Judicial Council are assigned as liaisons to local trial courts. Their reports, recorded and posted on the California Courts YouTube channel, reveal the dire conditions of California's underfunded courts, county-by-county. 

Snapshots provided by each county court detail the results of ongoing cuts, reserves sweeping, and other reductions in resources. Use the map and the table below to locate information by county.


 map icon
View all 58 County Snapshots (4.3MB)


More Statewide Details


Budget cuts have had major impact on court staffing. What does this mean to the public? Longer drives to reach courthouses, longer lines at courthouses, and unprecedented case delays.

Here are some of the impacts on critical services reported by surveyed courts:

•   Most courts have had to reduce self-help or family law facilitator services
•   Many no longer provide court reporters in civil, family, and probate matters
•   Many have reduced court interpreter services in civil cases (services in criminal cases are constitutionally required)
•   Many have cut specialty courts—innovative, problem-solving courts that serve the most vulnerable in society.
     Examples: drug court, homeless court, mental health court, youth court, and domestic violence court
•   Many have reduced security measures
•   In San Bernardino and Fresno, court users must now drive up to three hours to reach their closest courthouse
•   Nearly two dozen critically needed courthouse construction projects are on hold, and many will not proceed unless funds are restored.

Without adequate reinvestment in the courts, the public will see further strain :

•   Courts will be forced to implement more layoffs, close more courtrooms, and further reduce services and hours.
•   Some courts anticipate having to shutter civil courtrooms entirely.
•   Traffic, family, juvenile, probate and small claims issues will be delayed, and access to justice will be severely limited.
•   Urgently needed courthouse projects will be delayed; more may have to be canceled.