Fire Life Safety Building Deficiency Corrections, RFP-FS-2021-22-JP

Update: November 15, 2022
Notice of Intent to Award

 

Update: November 7, 2022
ITB-Answers-to-Questions-Master-110422-Final-RevisedQ30-Q47-Q49-Q50-Q53
ITB-Answers-to-Questions-Master-110422-Q-30-Seating-Details

Update: November 1, 2022
ITB-Answers to Questions Master 11-1-22

Update: October 31, 2022
ITB-Answers to Questions Master 10-31-22
Project Specifications - Addendum #1
Project Drawings - Central Justice Center FLS Drawing Set - Addendum #1

Update: October 19, 2022
Questions and Answers


Judicial Council. Judicial Council of California (“Council”), chaired by the Chief Justice of California, is the primary policy making body of the California judicial system. The Council is supported by an administrative agency also called Judicial Council of California (“Judicial Council”). Judicial Council issues this to General Contractors as Prospective Pre-Qualified Bidders Invitation to Bid (“ITB”) for the Fire Life Safety Building Deficiency Corrections, Floors 1, 2 and 3 Project, as further described in the “Project Description” section below (“Project”).
 

Purpose / Eligibility. Through this ITB, Judicial Council invites the submission of Submittal Bid Packages (as defined below) from appropriately licensed general contractors (“Contractor(s)”) to prequalified as eligible to submit a bid to perform construction services for the Project. Judicial Council’s Invitation to Bid that includes the project manual and bid documents (“Project Manual”), to Prequalified Contractors inviting the submission of bids.

Bids must be received by no later than 10:00 AM Pacific Time on November 14th, 2022.

Judicial Council will open sealed Bids and publicly them read aloud by video conference via Microsoft Teams on November 14th, 2022, at 2:00 PM.

Only electronic Bids will be accepted. For electronic submissions email to the following email addresses by the due date and time:

Bid Submittals email to: RFP-FS-2021-22-JP-Santa-Ana-Submit-Bids@jud.ca.gov

Note: Indicate the RFP number and name of Proposer’s organization in the subject line of the email.

All Attachments are posted to this RFP website as separate documents and including “File Transfer Process” web site which an email will be sent to access for additional documents pertaining to this RFP:

Request for Bids - RFP-FS-2021-22-JP – Delayed Until Further Notice June 7, 2022 https://www.courts.ca.gov/48007.htm

RFP-FS-2021-22-JP - Reissued

 

ATTACHMENTS:

  1. RFP-FS-2021-22-JP-Invitation-to-Bid
  2. RFP-FS-2021-22-JP-Administrative-Rules
  3. RFP-FS-2021-22-JP-Internal-Background-Check
  4. RFP-FS-2021-22-JP-Tool-Control-Policy
  5. RFP-FS-2021-JP-OCIP-Safety-Rgmts-Manual
  6. RFP-FS-2021-22-JP-OCIP-Procedures-Manual
  7. RFP-FS-2021-22-JP-Questions-and-Answers-Form
  8. RFP-FS-2021-JP-General-Certifications-Form
  9. RFP-FS-2021-JP-Payee-Data-Record-Form-204
  10. RFP-FS-2021-JP-Payee-Data-Record-Suppmt-205
  11. RFP-FS-2021-JP-Darfur-Certification
  12. RFP-FS-2021-JP-Unruh-Certification

File Transfer Process Files Link “Drop Box”

* Day of Posting Solicitation: Prequalified Bidders will be given access to the below documentation via an email Drop Box invitation, from the JCC Project Manager, Kersi Sekhon. Any trouble accessing this site, please immediately send an email to: Kesri.sekhon@apsi6d.com

  1. Project Specifications
  2. Project Drawings - Central Justice Center FLS Drawing Set
  3. 2001747 CJC Courthouse Fire Sprinkler Study 21-0427
  4. Pre-Renovation Asbestos Survey Report
  5. As-Built Drawings

NOTE: The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.